怎样正确解读sci审稿意见

　　很多作者在投搞完后会面临这样一件事就是修改论文，一般修改论文都会有审稿意见，那专家给的审稿意见如果自己看不懂或者不明白什么意思就不太好改论文，下面小编就跟大家来聊一聊专家给的审稿意见具体的意义。

　　一、最常见的SCI审稿意见有哪些

　　前言：1.The authors state that “there are a few reports about proteins induced by water deficit”. Please be more precise.

　　2.I wonder whether in the introduction the Authors could add some more references on the already knowledge on drought stress and ECM.

　　关于结果及图表：1.Probably the quality of the pictures in figure 3 could be improved in the last version.

　　2.There are also structure errors, as methods are also being described in the “results” section and objectives in the “material and methods” section.

　　关于结论：The conclusion section should revised by definite conclusion sentence.

　　以上的这些审稿意见都是比较常见的问题，下面来看看具体的审稿意见有什么含义。

　　二、审稿意见的具体解析

　　1.审稿人问题的意见：“The author(s) need to seriously revisit their writing skills of a formal article in English. I was unable to comprehend what the authors wanted to deliver due to bad English.”

　　诚挚的建议：“Before it is published, however, it needs to be clarified in many places. The author(s) are sometimes too verbose and sometimes too cryptic. This is probably because their native language is not English. If so, they have probably had a native English speaker correct the grammar to a reasonable and publishable standard.”

　　这次的审稿意见主要说的是SCI写作用的是英语进行的，一定要重视英语语言表达科技论文的正确性。

　　2.The subject of paper is interesting, but the current version needs significant improvement in organization. The abstract needs rewriting. The current abstract does not reflect the current title and content of the paper.

　　该条审稿意见对我某篇论文的体例写作不满意，提出了论文结构等需要调整和修改。

　　对待审稿人的意见一定要认真修改，不懂得地方要及时的询问、查阅资料，不要已为自己懂了，最后又没改对。必要的时候还是要请教一下专业人士。

　　对于怎样正确解读sci审稿意见的内容，小编就介绍到这里了。大家可以持续关注123学术网，小编会为大家持续更新最新信息。